🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming compensation amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action is a clear response by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as confiscating European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

The clearing house refused to comment on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such holdings can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. They are also crafting protections to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed plan, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be required to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a clear signal that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the reparations."